Drop in Cryptocurrency: Real Causes and Future Impacts
Aug 10, 2025
The accuracy of historical tombstone inscriptions remains a critical consideration in genealogical and historical research. This analysis examines the documented discrepancies in the birth year attributed to Reuben "Bone" Mizelle on his Manatee County, Florida tombstone (1847-1921) through systematic evaluation of primary source materials. The investigation reveals significant inconsistencies between the memorialized date and contemporaneous records.
This analysis employs source triangulation, comparing the tombstone inscription against U.S. Federal Census records, military service documentation, and official vital statistics. All referenced materials are publicly accessible through the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), FamilySearch.org, and the Florida Department of Health.
The Mizelle memorial at Manatee Cemetery lists lifespan as 1847-1921. This date appears widely replicated in secondary genealogical sources.
Primary Source: FocusQuill, 2023
Mizelle's January 6, 1856, enlistment documents explicitly state his age as 18 years. Calculating backward (1856 - 18 years) establishes a birth year of 1837 or early 1838.
NARA, Compiled Military Service Record of Reuben Mizell, Florida Mounted Volunteers
Records Mizelle's death as March 12, 1921 (consistent with tombstone), but calculates his age as 83 years, 2 months, and 12 days. Retroactive calculation (March 12, 1921 - 83 years) yields a birth date of December 31, 1837.
Florida Department of Health, File #12301
The evidentiary record demonstrates a clear pattern:
Based on the preponderance of primary source evidence, the birth year 1847 inscribed on Reuben "Bone" Mizelle's tombstone is incorrect. The correct birth year is 1837 (specifically December 1837 per the 1900 census and death certificate). The 1880 census record – the only document supporting the 1847 date – likely contains an enumerator error or was misinterpreted when the tombstone was commissioned. This case underscores the necessity of source triangulation in historical research, demonstrating that even widely accepted memorial inscriptions require verification against contemporaneous documentation.